TECHNOPARTICIPATION: Intermeshing performative pedagogy and interruption

Clicks: 303
ID: 83670
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in body, space & technology journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Arguing for the positive disruptive nature of interruption, this article concentrates on my current performative and pedagogic usage of Skype in order to promote the positive aspects of interruptive elements within performative pedagogy. Referring to technoparticipation, this article explains how teaching and learning activities that combine performance, participation, and technology within the learning environment can be punctuated with varying degrees of interruption that are structurally engineered into their framework. This practice as research is supported by a Loughborough University Teaching Innovation Award and draws together discussions from within Performance Studies and the ever-growing discipline of E-learning. Skype as interruption is addressed in terms of both theory and practice in order to argue that its interruptive capacities are useful in unpacking key concepts relating to the terms ‘embodiment’ and ‘disembodiment’,‘virtuality’ and ‘physicality’, and ‘absence’ and ‘presence’ amongst others. This article focuses on an instance of 'technoparticipation' practice that took place in Summer 2015 at University College Cork. The project was put forward as prime evidence of how technology and the operations of interruption can collectively be used to further understand the aforementioned concepts. The writing that follows explains how the write-up preceding, during and post event at UCC relates to a three-stage teaching process. This process - 'Anticipation, Action, and Analysis' – was designed as an extension to an existing model of reflective practice (Rolfe 2001).
Reference Key
campbell2016technoparticipationbody Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Campbell, Lee;
Journal body, space & technology journal
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.