Survey on Wireless Technology Trade-Offs for the Industrial Internet of Things.

Clicks: 274
ID: 83187
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #755 of 1,694 articles by views in sensors

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,694 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment.
Reference Key
seferagi2020surveysensors Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Seferagić, Amina;Famaey, Jeroen;De Poorter, Eli;Hoebeke, Jeroen;
Journal sensors
Year 2020
DOI
E488
URL
Keywords
bluetooth low energy (ble) lora ble long range ieee 802.11ah isa100.11a industrial internet of things (iiot) narrowband iot (nb-iot) time slotted channel hopping (tsch) wifi halow wirelesshart

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.