Clinic-pathological features of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion.
Clicks: 351
ID: 81417
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
64.8
/100
351 views
262 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in Cancer investigation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To investigate the differences of clinic-pathological features among ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion (DCIS-MI) and early invasive carcinoma (IDC) in stage T1. From January 2014 to December 2018, 308 cases DCIS, DCIS-MI 92 cases and 111 cases of T1a, 343 cases of T1b, and 1032 cases of T1c were investigated in a retrospective analysis. The population and clinic-pathological characteristics including age, menstrual status, surgical mode, lymph node status and molecular markers were compared in each group. Survival rate of all patients were followed up for 5 years. Compared with DCIS-MI group, the higher breast-conserving rate and lower lymph node metastasis rate in the DCIS group were shown in the DCIS-MI group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in tumor diameter, number of tumors, ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 expression, molecular typing, (P > 0.05). The expression of Ki67 in T1a, T1b and T1c groups increased gradually with elevated grades (P < 0.05). The proportion of HER2-positive patients in DCIS-MI group was significantly higher than that in T1a-b-c (P < 0.05). there were no significant differences in DFS and OS between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The clinic-pathological features of DCIS-MI are similar to those of DCIS and T1a, but significantly different from T1c.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (132 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
zheng2020clinicpathologicalcancer
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Zheng, Jie;Zhou, Tao;Li, Fang;Shi, Jiajie;Zhang, Lina; |
| Journal | Cancer investigation |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1080/07357907.2020.1715422
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.