Le gant constitutionnel réversible : accessoire de l’uniforme militaire.Regard critique sur la crise constitutionnelle algérienne de 2019
Clicks: 376
ID: 80357
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
376 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in l’année du maghreb
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The widespread public rejection for a 5th mandate of the now former President of the Republic Bouteflika gradually leaded to a constant expression of dissent against the Algerian regime as a whole. Much more than a simple political crisis and beyond the future of certain high-ranking officials, legitimacy and legality of the key Algerian State authorities or institutions are challenged, i.e. the Presidency of the Republic, the Government, the Parliament, the Constitutional Council and the ANP Military Staff. Protesters claim a « second Republic » that must be a « civil State, not a military ». In front of an increased popular mobilisation and an upgrading level of political grievances, the regime in place took steps that are clearly against the 1996 Constitution or that can be regarded as a constitutional transgression, although it claims to respect the content of the Constitution and protect the institutions. Now, this situation leads Algeria towards a new constitutional deadlock: the de facto prolongation of an interim power at the head of the State for an unlimited duration. The crucial issue in the background is about the role of the army. From now on, in practice and openly, the army holds a monopoly on political decisions, while defending itself not to interfere in politics. The high command refuses the idea of transitional institutions as well as a next election of a constituant assembly in the name of the constitutional order from whom it alleges, wrongly by law, that the army is the guardian. In lieu, the high command tries to impose Presidential elections while increasing repression. But popular mobilisation stands up against any election as long as key figures of the regime will stay in power and until all guarantees for free elections are not fulfilled.
| Reference Key |
boumghar2019lelanne
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Boumghar, Mouloud; |
| Journal | l’année du maghreb |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.