Mapping the Fungal Battlefield: Using Chemistry and Deletion Mutants to Monitor Interspecific Chemical Interactions Between Fungi.

Clicks: 337
ID: 80326
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #57 of 201 articles by views in Frontiers in microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Fungi grow in competitive environments, and to cope, they have evolved strategies, such as the ability to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites. This begs two related questions. First, how do secondary metabolites influence fungal ecology and interspecific interactions? Second, can these interspecific interactions provide a way to "see" how fungi respond, chemically, within a competitive environment? To evaluate these, and to gain insight into the secondary metabolic arsenal fungi possess, we co-cultured , a genetically tractable fungus that produces a suite of mycotoxins, with , a fungus that produces the fungistatic compound and FDA-approved drug, griseofulvin. To monitor and characterize fungal chemistry , we used the droplet-liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe (droplet probe). The droplet probe makes a microextraction at defined locations on the surface of the co-culture, followed by analysis of the secondary metabolite profile via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Using this, we mapped and compared the spatial profiles of secondary metabolites from both fungi in monoculture versus co-culture. predominantly biosynthesized griseofulvin and dechlorogriseofulvin in monoculture. In contrast, under co-culture conditions a deadlock was formed between the two fungi, and biosynthesized the same two secondary metabolites, along with dechloro-5'-hydroxygriseofulvin and 5'-hydroxygriseofulvin, all of which have fungistatic properties, as well as mycotoxins like cytochalasin D and cytochalasin C. In contrast, in co-culture, increased the production of the mycotoxins fumitremorgin B and verruculogen, but otherwise remained unchanged relative to its monoculture. To evaluate that secondary metabolites play an important role in defense and territory establishment, we co-cultured lacking the master regulator of secondary metabolism with . We found that the reduced secondary metabolite biosynthesis of the Δ strain of eliminated the organism's ability to compete in co-culture and led to its displacement by . These results demonstrate the potential of chemical analysis and deletion mutant approaches for shedding light on the ecological roles of secondary metabolites and how they influence fungal ecological strategies; co-culturing may also stimulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites that are not produced in monoculture in the laboratory.
Reference Key
knowles2019mappingfrontiers Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Knowles, Sonja L;Raja, Huzefa A;Wright, Allison J;Lee, Ann Marie L;Caesar, Lindsay K;Cech, Nadja B;Mead, Matthew E;Steenwyk, Jacob L;Ries, Laure N A;Goldman, Gustavo H;Rokas, Antonis;Oberlies, Nicholas H;
Journal Frontiers in microbiology
Year 2019
DOI
10.3389/fmicb.2019.00285
URL
Keywords
secondary metabolites fungi in situ co-culturing interspecific interactions laea

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.