Trends in Shared Decision-Making Studies From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Clicks: 250
ID: 79317
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
To systematically analyze the global development trends and research focuses of shared decision-making (SDM) studies as a reference for researchers. We conducted a systematic search of the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection on April 17, 2019, to retrieve studies related to SDM published from 2009 to 2018. VOSviewer (1.6.10), CiteSpace (5.4.R1) and Excel 2016 were used to analyze key features of SDM studies, including annual output, countries/regions, organizations, journals, authors, references, research hot-spots, and frontiers. Up to April 17, 2019, a total of 6,629 studies on SDM were identified as published between 2009 and 2018. The United States participated in the most studies ( = 3,118), with the University of California-San Francisco ranking first ( = 183). [impact factor (IF) 2017 = 2.785] published the most studies ( = 257). Legare F participated in the most studies ( = 101), and the paper "Charles C, 1997, Soc Sci Med, V44, P681" occupied the highest co-citation ( = 657) position. The research hotspots and frontiers included "Informed consent," "Surgery," "Depression," "Older adult," and "Patient-centered care." The number of studies concerning SDM has continued to increase since 2009, with the United States leading the field. The landscape of the basis of SDM included mainly concept, practice framework and effect assessment of SDM. "Informed consent," "Surgery," "Depression," "Older adult," and "Patient-centered care" reflected the latest research focuses, and should receive more attention.
Reference Key
lu2019trendsfrontiers Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lu, Cuncun;Li, Xiuxia;Yang, Kehu;
Journal Frontiers in public health
Year 2019
DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2019.00384
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.