Trends in Shared Decision-Making Studies From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Clicks: 310
ID: 79317
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #36 of 100 articles by views in Frontiers in public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To systematically analyze the global development trends and research focuses of shared decision-making (SDM) studies as a reference for researchers. We conducted a systematic search of the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection on April 17, 2019, to retrieve studies related to SDM published from 2009 to 2018. VOSviewer (1.6.10), CiteSpace (5.4.R1) and Excel 2016 were used to analyze key features of SDM studies, including annual output, countries/regions, organizations, journals, authors, references, research hot-spots, and frontiers. Up to April 17, 2019, a total of 6,629 studies on SDM were identified as published between 2009 and 2018. The United States participated in the most studies ( = 3,118), with the University of California-San Francisco ranking first ( = 183). [impact factor (IF) 2017 = 2.785] published the most studies ( = 257). Legare F participated in the most studies ( = 101), and the paper "Charles C, 1997, Soc Sci Med, V44, P681" occupied the highest co-citation ( = 657) position. The research hotspots and frontiers included "Informed consent," "Surgery," "Depression," "Older adult," and "Patient-centered care." The number of studies concerning SDM has continued to increase since 2009, with the United States leading the field. The landscape of the basis of SDM included mainly concept, practice framework and effect assessment of SDM. "Informed consent," "Surgery," "Depression," "Older adult," and "Patient-centered care" reflected the latest research focuses, and should receive more attention.
Reference Key
lu2019trendsfrontiers Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lu, Cuncun;Li, Xiuxia;Yang, Kehu;
Journal Frontiers in public health
Year 2019
DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2019.00384
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.