Assessment of response to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with e13a2 and e14a2 transcripts of BCR/ABL1 gene.

Clicks: 369
ID: 79070
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in problemy radiatsiinoi medytsyny ta radiobiolohii

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Assess the influence of e13a2 and e14a2 transcripts of BCR/ABL1 gene on the efficiency of imatinib ther apy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.We examined 508 patients with the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia without radi ation in anamnesis as well as 13 patients with the similar diagnosis and with confirmed presence of radiation expo sure due to the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident.No significant differences in hematologic parameters, rate of additional chromosomal aberrations and f vari ant translocations were observed between patients with е13а2 and е14а2 transcript. Cumulative probability of com plete cytogenetic response did not differ in patients with е13а2 and е14а2 transcript and was 76 and 80 % respec tively (р = 0,981). Median of achieving a complete cytogenetic response was 20 months in both patient groups. Significantly more patients with e14a2 transcript compared to patients with e13a2 achieved major molecular response by 12 month of therapy (61.5 % versus 23.0 %, p = 0.016). The higher incidence of deep molecular response by 24 month of therapy was revealed in this group (38.7 % versus 6.25 %, p = 0.018). The overall survival and pro gression free survival rates were not statistically different between two groups with different transcripts. However, the rate of event free survival was statistically lower for the patients with e13a2 transcript compared to the ones with e14a2 transcript (51 % versus 62.0 %, p = 0.039). The number of primary resistant patients was 40 % regardless of the transcript expressed. A significant prevalence in incidence either of lost complete cytogenetic response or fail ure of the major molecular response was shown in patients with e13a2 transcript compared to patients with e14a2 transcripts (43.5 % versus 24.8 %, p = 0.015).Imatinib therapy is more effective for CML patients with e14a2 transcript compared to patients with e13a2 transcript expression. The transcript e13a2can be viewed as a adverse prognostic factor for imatinib therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Reference Key
dmytrenko2015assessmentproblemy Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dmytrenko, I V;Fedorenko, V G;Shlyakhtychenko, T Y;Sholoyko, V V;Lyubarets, T F;Malinkina, T V;Dmytrenko, O O;Balan, V V;Kravchenko, S M;Martina, Z V;Tovstogan, A O;Minchenko, J M;Dyagil, I S;
Journal problemy radiatsiinoi medytsyny ta radiobiolohii
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.