Incidental Findings Identified on Head MRI for Investigation of Cognitive Impairment: A Retrospective Review.
Clicks: 387
ID: 79019
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
82.0
/100
387 views
266 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 6 articles by views in dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Incidental findings are common in presumed healthy volunteers but are infrequently studied in patients in a clinical context.To determine the prevalence, nature, and management implications of incidental findings on head MRI in patients presenting with cognitive symptoms, and to quantify and describe unexpected MRI abnormalities that are of uncertain relevance to the patient's cognitive symptoms.A single-centre retrospective review of patients attending a regional early-onset cognitive disorders clinic between March 2012 and October 2018. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent head MRI were reviewed. Unexpected MRI findings were classified according to their severity and likelihood of being incidental. Markers of small vessel disease and cerebral atrophy were excluded.Records of 694 patients were reviewed (median age 60 years, 49.9% female), of whom 514 (74.1%) underwent head MRI. 54% of the patients received a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disorder. Overall 111 incidental findings were identified in 100 patients of whom 18 patients (3.5%, 95% CI 2.2-5.6%) had 18 incidental findings classified as requiring additional medical evaluation. 82 patients (16%, 95% CI 13.0-19.5%) had 93 incidental findings without clearly defined diagnostic consequences. 17 patients (3.3%) underwent further investigations, 14 patients (2.7%) were referred to another specialist clinic and 3 patients (0.6%) were treated surgically. Two patients had MRI findings of uncertain relevance to their cognitive symptoms, necessitating prolonged clinic follow-up.Incidental findings are common in patients with cognitive impairment from this large clinic-based series; however, few required additional medical evaluation. These data could help inform discussions between clinicians and people with cognitive symptoms regarding the likelihood and potential implications of incidental imaging findings.
| Reference Key |
glasmacher2019incidentaldementia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Glasmacher, Stella Andrea;Thomas, Hannah Sam;Stirland, Lucy;Wilkinson, Tim;Lumsden, Jane;Langlands, Gavin;Waddell, Briony;Holloway, Guy;Thompson, Gerard;Pal, Suvankar; |
| Journal | dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1159/000503956
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.