[Correlation between clinical, arthrographic and arthroscopic findings in meniscal lesions].

Clicks: 365
ID: 78069
1986
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in der chirurg; zeitschrift fur alle gebiete der operativen medizen

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
There are many different references about the accuracy of physical examination and arthrographic exploration in diagnosing meniscal tears. Therefore we analysed retrospectively 334 arthroscopic examinations, which were done because of a suspected or a proven meniscal lesion. We found an accuracy of 84% true-positives and true-negatives with regard to the physical examination and an accuracy of only 71.2% with regard to the arthrographic investigation. Our results were converted into a formula (stated in [11]), declaring the predictive value of a result. These findings led us to a certain scheme in diagnosing meniscal or other knee pain, presented here.
Reference Key
eichenauer1986correlationder Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Eichenauer, M;Mostegl, A;Agreiter, H Z;
Journal der chirurg; zeitschrift fur alle gebiete der operativen medizen
Year 1986
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords
prognosis osteoarthritis knee arthroscopy arthroplasty artroplastia artroscopia artrosis pronóstico rodilla

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.