Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells.

Clicks: 297
ID: 77831
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #9 of 12 articles by views in journal of drug delivery science and technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigated the cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticle (Gem-SLN) on the patient-derived primary pancreatic cancer cell lines (PPCL-46) and MiaPaCa-2. Different SLN formulations were prepared from glyceryl monostearate (GMS), polysorbate 80 (Tween® 80) and poloxamer 188 (Pol 188) as surfactants using a cold homogenization method. Gem-SLN was characterized for particle size and charge distribution, entrapment efficiency and loading capacity. Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to verify Gem and SLN interaction while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to acquire thermodynamic information on Gem-SLN. Cytotoxicity studies was conducted on PPCL-46 cells and Mia-PaCa-2 cells. Among the different Gem-SLN formulations prepared, Gem-SLN was selected based on entrapment efficiency (EE) of Gem, loading efficiency of Gem, cytotoxicity and rate of Gem release. Growth inhibition of Gem-SLN-treated PPCL-46 culture (IC (2D) =27± 5 μM; IC (3D) = 66 ± 2 μM) was remarkably higher than gemcitabine hydrochloride (GemHCl)-treated PPCL-46 culture (IC (2D) =126±3 μM; IC (3D) =241±3 μM). Similar trend of higher Gem-SLN inhibition in MiaPaCa-2 culture was found (IC (2D) =56±16 μM; IC (3D) =127±4 μM) compared with GemHCl-treated Mia-PaCa-2 culture (IC (2D) =188±46 μM; IC (3D) =254±52 μM). The anticancer activity of Gem-SLN was significantly more effective than GemHCl in PPCL-46 compared to Mia-PaCa-2 cancer cells. Schematic diagram for preparation of Gem-SLN through cold homogenization and methods for characterization and studies.
Reference Key
affram2020cytotoxicjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Affram, Kevin O;Smith, Taylor;Ofori, Edward;Krishnan, Sunil;Underwood, Patrick;Trevino, Jose G;Agyare, Edward;
Journal journal of drug delivery science and technology
Year 2020
DOI
101374
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.