Avaliação das habilidades auditivas em crianças com alterações de aprendizagem Evaluating auditory abilities in children with learning disabilities
Clicks: 366
ID: 77826
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.6
/100
365 views
297 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
OBJETIVO: comparar o desempenho na Avaliação Simplificada do Processamento Auditivo (ASPA) e no Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test (PSI), de crianças com alteração de Aprendizagem da Leitura e Escrita e sem este tipo de alteração. MÉTODOS: participaram da pesquisa 28 crianças na faixa etária de 8 a 12 anos, do sexo masculino e feminino. Os participantes foram submetidos ao Teste de Desempenho Escolar (TDE) para a categorização dos grupos de estudo e controle, e, para avaliação das habilidades auditivas foram aplicados a ASPA e o Teste PSI. RESULTADOS: não foi observada associação estatisticamente significante entre o desempenho nos testes de Processamento Auditivo (PA) e o grupo com dificuldades de aprendizagem, apesar de ter sido verificada maior frequência de alterações no grupo de estudo em relação ao grupo controle, em todos os testes. Na ASPA, o teste em que se observou maior número de alterações foi o Teste de Memória Sequencial Verbal, contudo, o Teste de Memória Sequencial Não-verbal foi o que mostrou maior diferença entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes no desempenho na Avaliação Simplificada do Processamento Auditivo (ASPA) e no Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test (PSI), das crianças com alteração de Aprendizagem da Leitura e Escrita e sem alteração.
PURPOSE: to compare performance of children with or without alterations in reading and writing skills acquisition in the Simplified Auditory Processing Test (SAPT) and the Pediatric Speech Intelligibility (PSI) tests. METHODS: twenty-eight female and male children aged 8-12 took part in this study. The subjects did the Academic Achievement Test (TDE) in order to be placed in the study group or control group and, for the assessment of hearing abilities, they took the SAPT and the PSI tests. RESULTS: no statistically significant association was found between performances in tests for hearing processing and the group with learning problems although alterations were observed in the study group more frequently than in the control group in all tests. In SAPT, the test which detected more alterations was the test for verbal Sequential Memory; however, the Nonverbal Sequential Memory test was the one which showed more differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: no statistically significant association between performances were found both by the HPSA and the PSI tests in children with or without alterations in reading and writing skills acquisition.
PURPOSE: to compare performance of children with or without alterations in reading and writing skills acquisition in the Simplified Auditory Processing Test (SAPT) and the Pediatric Speech Intelligibility (PSI) tests. METHODS: twenty-eight female and male children aged 8-12 took part in this study. The subjects did the Academic Achievement Test (TDE) in order to be placed in the study group or control group and, for the assessment of hearing abilities, they took the SAPT and the PSI tests. RESULTS: no statistically significant association was found between performances in tests for hearing processing and the group with learning problems although alterations were observed in the study group more frequently than in the control group in all tests. In SAPT, the test which detected more alterations was the test for verbal Sequential Memory; however, the Nonverbal Sequential Memory test was the one which showed more differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: no statistically significant association between performances were found both by the HPSA and the PSI tests in children with or without alterations in reading and writing skills acquisition.
| Reference Key |
pelitero2010avaliacorevista
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pelitero, Tatiane Maria;Manfredi, Alessandra Kerli da Silva;Schneck, Andrea Pires Corrêa; |
| Journal | revista cefac |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.