Positive circumferential resection margins following locally advanced colon cancer surgery: Risk factors and survival impact.

Clicks: 389
ID: 77469
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 7 articles by views in Journal of surgical oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While the prognostic implications of positive circumferential resection margins (CRM) have been established for rectal cancer, its significance in colon cancer has not been well defined. The aim of the current study was to determine national rates for positive CRM in locally advanced colon cancer, associated factors, and survival impact.The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with stage II-III adenocarcinoma of the colon (2004-2015).Positive CRM was identified in 9% of stage II and 12% of stage III patients. Factors associated with negative CRM included surgery in a high-volume facility, adequate lymph-node harvest, and negative distal/proximal margins. No difference in CRM rates was observed between surgical approaches, although having a positive CRM was significantly associated with higher conversion rates. Positive CRM was associated with significantly lower overall survival on both univariate and multivariable analysis.Positive CRM rates exceeded 10% nationally and have an adverse impact on survival. While several tumor characteristics were identified as independent risk factors, oncologic resections and surgery at high-volume centers were associated with lower rates of positive CRM. These findings emphasize the need for process improvement initiatives targeting modifiable factors, including adoption of appropriate oncologic techniques, standardized pathology reporting, and potential neoadjuvant strategies.
Reference Key
goffredo2019positivejournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Goffredo, Paolo;Zhou, Peige;Ginader, Timothy;Hrabe, Jennifer;Gribovskaja-Rupp, Irena;Kapadia, Muneera;You, Y Nancy;Hassan, Imran;
Journal Journal of surgical oncology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1002/jso.25801
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.