Failure to rescue and 30-day in-hospital mortality in hospitals with and without crew-resource-management safety training.
Clicks: 361
ID: 77465
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
75.6
/100
361 views
246 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 6 articles by views in research in nursing & health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Failure to rescue (FTR) occurs when a clinician is unable to save a hospitalized patient's life when they experience a complication that was not present on admission. Research suggests that a focus on patient safety, including implementing airline-industry-based-crew-resource management (CRM) training, can improve patient outcomes, however, the effects of CRM on FTR are unknown. This study examined FTR and 30-day in-hospital mortality (IM) outcomes in two hospitals to determine if differences existed in the treatment hospital (received CRM training) and the comparison hospital (did not receive CRM training). Researchers expected there would be lower rates of FTR and IM in the treatment hospital than the comparison hospital. The study utilized a matched two-group comparison, cross-sectional quasi-experimental design. Over 10,000 patients (n = 10,823) comprised the study with 1,764 having at least one FTR complication. Adjusted odds of FTR were 2.9% higher for treatment versus comparison but these results did not reach significance. The adjusted odds of IM were 0.4% higher for treatment versus comparison but not significantly higher. Although the reasons for our findings remain unclear, previous researchers also found that CRM training improved staff outcomes but unexpectedly did not improve patient outcomes. CRM training may best be used to target changes in staff behaviors and improvement in staff outcomes. Refresher CRM training may be needed to prevent drifting back into longstanding behaviors. Reductions in FTR and patients with IM outcomes may require more comprehensive, multipronged interventions in addition to CRM training.
| Reference Key |
bacon2019failureresearch
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bacon, Cynthia T;McCoy, Thomas P;Henshaw, Daryl S; |
| Journal | research in nursing & health |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/nur.22007
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.