(Un)constitutionality of the provision on the principal purpose of transaction or arrangement test from the tax treaties

Clicks: 219
ID: 77115
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The principal purpose of transaction or arrangement test (PPT) contained in MLI authorises tax authorities to deny a treaty benefit. The structure of PPT shows that tax authorities were given wide discretion. Its wording does not determine what will be taxed in the source country once the benefit is denied. In authors' opinion the residence country may decide to deny the relief for elimination of double taxation if it considers that it is the conflict of qualifications that arises from differences in interpretation of treaty or facts rather than from differences in domestic law. The constitutionality of PPT may be assessed with respect to the principles of legal certainty and equality. The tax authorities were given arbitrary authorisation to assess whether it is an abusive "one of the principal purposes of a transaction" or a legitimate commercial objective. This may violate the principles of equality and taxation based on abilityto-pay.
Reference Key
dejan2019unconstitutionalityanali Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dejan, Popović;Gordana, Ilić-Popov;
Journal anali pravnog fakulteta u beogradu
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.