Farmers' knowledge and opinions towards bollgard II implementation in cotton production in western Burkina Faso.
Clicks: 352
ID: 77009
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
64.8
/100
352 views
236 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 28 articles by views in new biotechnology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In 2008, the commercial cultivation of Genetically Modified (GM) cotton (Bollgard II) started in Burkina Faso. The adoption rate increased rapidly in subsequent years to reach around 70% in 2014. Although some criticisms were raised concerning the suitability of the technology for the farming system in Burkina Faso, the introduction of transgenic cotton in the country was generally regarded as a great success. Despite this, during the 2016-2017 agricultural campaign, the government of Burkina Faso decided to suspend the cultivation of Bollgard II. In this context, this paper investigates farmers' knowledge, perceptions, opinions and attitudes towards Bollgard II as well as their views on the recent decision to suspend its cultivation. Data was collected from 324 cotton farmers, both growers of conventional and Bollgard II. The results showed that the farmers surveyed had a poor knowledge concerning the core concepts of biotechnology and Bollgard II in particular. Moreover, the regulatory oversight of the implementation of the technology was found insufficient, as illustrated by the lack of compliance with prescriptions concerning refuge areas and pesticide treatments. Nevertheless, overall, the farmers interviewed had a slightly positive opinion about the effects on yield, income and their wellbeing. In particular the reduction in pesticide treatments was perceived very positively by all respondents. Although the study finds that the majority of farmers disagreed with the recent suspension of Bt cotton cultivation by the government, it also makes clear that a thorough debate on the technology and its implementation is necessary.
| Reference Key |
sanou2018farmersnew
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sanou, Edouard I R;Gheysen, Godelieve;Koulibaly, Bazoumana;Roelofs, Caspar;Speelman, Stijn; |
| Journal | new biotechnology |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
S1871-6784(17)30166-8
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.