On a syntactic-semantic model with the locative case

论带处所格的句法-语义模型

Clicks: 312
ID: 76699
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in južnoslovenski filolog

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The topic of this paper is a syntactic-semantic model whose distinctive element is the locative case with the preposition U (IN) and the relevant feature (+) human being. This model is realized in three different variants - with the intransitive (A) or transitive verb (B), where the nominative in the function of subject and the locative indicate different (B1) or the same (B2) referents. Furthermore, the verb belongs to a semantic class which denotes emerging, stimulation, duration, fading away, diminishing or change in the intensity, in principle, of any phenomenon, and concretely in this model such verbs appear in the collocational link with the nouns implying man's psychological, physiological or mental states, feelings or mood. With an adequate analytic procedure, all the three variants of this model are approached from the syntactic-semantic and pragmatic perspective. The paper points to the causative semantics of these structures, reduced to the metalinguistic formula 'make that X V', which confirms that the semantics of these verb-noun collocational links, syntactically speaking, condenses a complex two-member sentential structure represented by the semantically deficient verb (= causative component) in the basic, matrix structure, and the complement clause with the conjunction DA (THAT) and the basic verb. And precisely from this semantic feature there follows that the notion in the locative case semantically, actually, represents the BEARER of a physiological, physiological or mental state, feeling, mood, so that it represents the GRAMMATICAL SUBJECT of the corresponding basic subordinated predication whose exponent, actually, is the grammatical subject in the structure with the intransitive verb (or with the syntactically-semantically intransitive verb structure), that is the object in the structure with the transitive verb. Two possible semantic interpretations of this model are presented: the one related to the referential pointing to the situation (a) and the other when the sentential proposition also includes the corresponding presupposition (b).
本文的研究对象是一种句法-语义模型，其区别性要素是带有介词 *U*（在……中 / IN）且具有相关特征[+人]（+ human being）的位格形式。该模型通过三种不同的变体实现——搭配不及物动词（A）或及物动词（B），其中充当主语功能的主格与位格所指称的对象可以不同（B1）或相同（B2）。此外，该动词属于一个特定的语义类，原则上表示任何现象的产生、激发、持续、消逝、减弱或强度的改变；在该模型中，这类动词具体表现为与暗示人的心理、生理或精神状态、情感或情绪的名词构成搭配联系。通过适当的分析程序，本文从句法-语义和语用视角对该模型的所有三种变体进行了考察。 本文指出了这些结构的致使语义，该语义可归结为元语言公式“make that X V”（致使X发生V），这证实了从句法角度来看，这些动名词搭配联系的语义凝聚了一个复杂的二项句子结构，该结构由基础母句结构中语义欠缺的动词（= 致使成分）以及带有连词 *DA*（THAT）和基本动词的补足语从句构成。正是基于这一语义特征，位格所表达的概念在语义上实际上代表了生理、生理或精神状态、情感及情绪的承担者（BEARER），因而构成了相应底层从属述谓的语法主语（GRAMMATICAL SUBJECT）；而该述谓的具体体现形式，实际上是不及物动词结构（或句法-语义不及物动词结构）中的语法主语，即及物动词结构中的宾语。本文提出了该模型的两种可能语义阐释：一种涉及对情境的指称性指示（a），另一种则是句子命题亦包含相应预设的情况（b）。
Reference Key
ivana2008onjuznoslovenski Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ivana, Antonić;
Journal južnoslovenski filolog
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2008/0350-185X0864007A.pdf
Keywords
Ecology Biology (General) Medicine Technology (General) Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar Science business social sciences (general) philology. linguistics history (general) and history of europe language and literature communication. mass media philosophy. psychology. religion international relations oral communication. speech

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.