Microscopic melanoma detection and classification: A framework of pixel-based fusion and multilevel features reduction.
Clicks: 330
ID: 76596
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.2
/100
330 views
219 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 15 articles by views in Microscopy research and technique
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The numbers of diagnosed patients by melanoma are drastic and contribute more deaths annually among young peoples. An approximately 192,310 new cases of skin cancer are diagnosed in 2019, which shows the importance of automated systems for the diagnosis process. Accordingly, this article presents an automated method for skin lesions detection and recognition using pixel-based seed segmented images fusion and multilevel features reduction. The proposed method involves four key steps: (a) mean-based function is implemented and fed input to top-hat and bottom-hat filters which later fused for contrast stretching, (b) seed region growing and graph-cut method-based lesion segmentation and fused both segmented lesions through pixel-based fusion, (c) multilevel features such as histogram oriented gradient (HOG), speeded up robust features (SURF), and color are extracted and simple concatenation is performed, and (d) finally variance precise entropy-based features reduction and classification through SVM via cubic kernel function. Two different experiments are performed for the evaluation of this method. The segmentation performance is evaluated on PH2, ISBI2016, and ISIC2017 with an accuracy of 95.86, 94.79, and 94.92%, respectively. The classification performance is evaluated on PH2 and ISBI2016 dataset with an accuracy of 98.20 and 95.42%, respectively. The results of the proposed automated systems are outstanding as compared to the current techniques reported in state of art, which demonstrate the validity of the proposed method.
| Reference Key |
rehman2020microscopicmicroscopy
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rehman, Amjad;Khan, Muhammad A;Mehmood, Zahid;Saba, Tanzila;Sardaraz, Muhammad;Rashid, Muhammad; |
| Journal | Microscopy research and technique |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1002/jemt.23429
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.