Perspectives of Complexity in Water Governance: Local Experiences of Global Trends

Clicks: 400
ID: 75657
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 5 articles by views in water alternatives

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Those responsible for water governance face great complexity. However, the conceptualisations of what comprises that complexity have been broad and inconsistent. When efforts are made to address the complexity in water governance, it is unclear whether the problems and the related solutions will be understood across the actors and institutions involved. This paper provides a review of the literature focused on global water governance to discern core themes that commonly characterise discussions of complexity. It then considers how the consequences of these issues are manifested at the local scale through an examination of empirical research of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and the Prachinburi River Basin Committee. The results demonstrate that a history of a technical, depoliticised discourse is often perceived to contribute to complexity. The consequence is that when a severe ecological disturbance occurs within a river basin with poorly understood causes, few tools are available to support river basin organisations to address the political nature of these challenges. Additionally, a lack of clear authority structures has been recognised globally, but locally this can contribute to conflict amongst the 'governors' of water. Finally, a range of contested definitions and governance frameworks exists that contributes to complexity, but confronting the diversity of perspectives can lead to ethical dilemmas given that the decisions will affect the health and livelihoods of basin communities.
Reference Key
moore2013perspectiveswater Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Moore, Michele-Lee;
Journal water alternatives
Year 2013
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue3/229-a6-3-9/file
Keywords
Zoology Biology (General) Botany Medicine (General) Medicine Technology Science environmental sciences geography (general) water supply for domestic and industrial purposes sewage collection and disposal systems. sewerage geography. anthropology. recreation evolution hydraulic engineering environmental technology. sanitary engineering

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.