The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.
Clicks: 326
ID: 74560
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
79.2
/100
326 views
216 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 4 articles by views in japanese journal of radiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The present study aims to assess the impact of acquisition time, different iterative reconstruction protocols as well as image context (including contrast levels and background activities) on the measured spatial resolution in PET images.Discovery 690 PET/CT scanner was used to quantify spatial resolutions in terms of full width half maximum (FWHM) as derived (i) directly from capillary tubes embedded in air and (ii) indirectly from 10 mm-diameter sphere of the NEMA phantom. Different signal-to-background ratios (SBRs), background activity levels and acquisition times were applied. The emission data were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction protocols. Various combinations of iterations and subsets (it × sub) were evaluated.For capillary tubes, improved FWHM values were obtained for higher it × sub, with improved performance for PSF algorithms relative to non-PSF algorithms. For the NEMA phantom, by increasing acquisition times from 1 to 5 min, intrinsic FWHM for reconstructions with it × sub 32 (54) was improved by 15.3% (13.2%), 15.1% (13.8%), 14.5% (12.8%) and 13.7% (12.7%) for OSEM, OSEM + PSF, OSEM + TOF and OSEM + PSF + TOF, respectively. Furthermore, for all reconstruction protocols, the FWHM improved with more impact for higher it × sub.Our results indicate that PET spatial resolution is greatly affected by SBR, background activity and the choice of the reconstruction protocols.
| Reference Key |
rezaei2020thejapanese
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rezaei, Sahar;Ghafarian, Pardis;Bakhshayesh-Karam, Mehrdad;Uribe, Carlos F;Rahmim, Arman;Sarkar, Saeed;Ay, Mohammad Reza; |
| Journal | japanese journal of radiology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s11604-019-00914-3
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.