Comparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Study

Clicks: 432
ID: 72649
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #3 of 27 articles by views in processes

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This work is a meta-study of CO2 capture processes for coal and natural gas power generation, including technologies such as post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture, the integrated gasification combined cycle process, oxyfuel combustion, membrane-based carbon capture processes, and solid oxide fuel cells. A literature survey of recent techno-economic studies was conducted, compiling relevant data on costs, efficiencies, and other performance metrics. The data were then converted in a consistent fashion to a common standard (such as a consistent net power output, country of construction, currency, base year of operation, and captured CO2 pressure) such that a meaningful and direct comparison of technologies can be made. The processes were compared against a standard status quo power plant without carbon capture to compute metrics such as cost of CO2 emissions avoided to identify the most promising designs and technologies to use for CO2 emissions abatement.
Reference Key
ii2017comparisonprocesses Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors II, Thomas A. Adams;Hoseinzade, Leila;Madabhushi, Pranav Bhaswanth;Okeke, Ikenna J.;
Journal processes
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/5/3/44
Keywords
chemistry Microbiology Biology (General) Medicine Chemical technology oceanography economic growth, development, planning

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.