Verifying the X for design framework capabilities in improving user experience evaluation activities

Clicks: 405
ID: 72420
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #4 of 14 articles by views in cogent engineering

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The literature offers methods and tools for user experience (UX) evaluation. Among them, the irMMs-based method exploits mental models related to specific situations of interaction. The literature also proposes frameworks and models to describe product development activities. One of these, the X for Design framework (XfD), allows modeling different activities and suggests modifications in order to improve them. This research aims at verifying the capabilities of the XfD in improving the irMMs-based method. Once improved thanks to the XfD, the irMMs-based method is adopted together with the original release of it and with the well-known Think Aloud usability evaluation method in evaluating the UX of a CAD software package. The comparison of the results starts demonstrating the capabilities of the XfD in improving UX evaluation activities. The research outcomes can be of interest for researchers who can exploit the XfD suggestions to deepen their knowledge about human cognitive processes and for industrial practitioners who can apply the suggestions proposed by the XfD to their own evaluation activities to make them more effective.
Reference Key
filippi2019verifyingcogent Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Filippi, Stefano;Barattin, Daniela;
Journal cogent engineering
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1576318
Keywords
Technology (General) Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics Dentistry nutritional diseases. deficiency diseases public aspects of medicine social sciences (general) management. industrial management electronic computers. computer science

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.