Simulation of relief-type diffractive lenses in ZEMAX using parametric modelling and scalar diffraction.

Clicks: 455
ID: 72348
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 50 articles by views in Applied optics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
For the simulation of relief-type diffractive surfaces, an efficient method has been developed and described. Based on zone decomposition, our approach maps the transmitted wavefront by ray tracing, while point spread function/modulation transfer function (PSF/MTF) plots are calculated by scalar diffraction, taking light diffracted into multiple orders into account inherently. Using a parametric user-defined surface, our solution makes the analysis and optimization of diffractive lenses possible directly inside optical design software. Implementation was carried out in ZEMAX in the form of a swift Windows Dynamic Link Library extension using an approximative, non-iterative algorithm. The average computation time increments relative to standard built-in surfaces are 38% and 21% for PSF and MTF calculations, respectively. Application of our method is illustrated by the analysis of diffractive intraocular lenses. For validation, numerical results were compared with analytical formulae and industry-standard measurements. The ray-tracing error caused by our approximation proved to be less than ${7} \cdot {{10}^{ - 6}}$7⋅10 wavelength, and the difference from the theoretical MTF calculations is 1%-2%. The RMS difference of the simulated-measured through-focus MTF values at 50 lp/mm is 0.031, equaling ${2}\sigma $2σ measuring accuracy.
Reference Key
nemesczopf2019simulationapplied Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nemes-Czopf, Anna;Bercsényi, Dániel;Erdei, Gábor;
Journal Applied optics
Year 2019
DOI
10.1364/AO.58.008931
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.