The coming 15 years in gynaecological pathology: digitisation, artificial intelligence, and new technologies.

Clicks: 391
ID: 71305
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 11 articles by views in histopathology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Surgical pathology forms the cornerstone of modern oncological medicine, owing to the wealth of clinically relevant information that can be obtained from tissue morphology. Although several ancillary testing modalities have been added to surgical pathology, the way in which we view and interpret tissue morphology has remained largely unchanged since the inception of our profession. In this review, we discuss new technological advances that promise to transform the way in which we access tissue morphology and how we use it to guide patient care.
Reference Key
farnell2020thehistopathology Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Farnell, David A;Huntsman, David;Bashashati, Ali;
Journal histopathology
Year 2020
DOI
10.1111/his.13991
URL
Keywords
artificial intelligence Machine learning digital pathology Mass spectrometry immunohistochemistry

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.