Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
Clicks: 376
ID: 71178
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
84.9
/100
373 views
303 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for retaining control over personal data. Concerns about the aims and range of data repository appeared to influence withdrawal of participation. Our findings underscore ethical and practical issues relating to data collection and consent procedures in human research.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (118 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
broekstra2019trustjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Broekstra, Reinder;Aris-Meijer, Judith;Maeckelberghe, Els;Stolk, Ronald;Otten, Sabine; |
| Journal | journal of empirical research on human research ethics : jerhre |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/1556264619888365
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.