Implementation of Reader-Response Theory in Teaching Short Story
Clicks: 233
ID: 70989
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
67.5
/100
233 views
161 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #5 of 10 articles by views in literacy trek
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Reader-response theorists such as I. A. Richards (1974), L. Rosenblatt (1993), S. Fish (1970), and W. Iser (1978) argue that reading is an act which is actualized in the form of a “transaction” between the text and the reader. They observe that each reading activity is a unique experience in which the reader is involved in ethical, intellectual, social and aesthetic terms as a whole. In this paper we share our experiences of using Graham Greene’s short story, The Destructors, in “literature and language teaching” course as a sample. Indeed, the students are asked to write response papers for different short stories for twelve weeks. The data is analyzed qualitatively and thematically by using the tools suggested in reader-response theory. To collect personal response, we asked the students to read the short story as out-of-class assignment and write personal responses focusing mainly on the three approaches as “literature as content”, “language-based” and “literature for personal enrichment” elaborated and categorized by G. Lazar (1993). Students’ responses suggested that they treated the short story as transaction, and that they produced aesthetic readings rather than efferent. Producing response papers regularly during term-time contributed to the students’ critical and creative reading skills. It is observed that eventually the students become mature and confident readers and learn how to go beyond the written text by adding their individual aesthetic judgments.
| Reference Key |
inan2018implementationliteracy
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Inan, Dilek;Boldan, Merve; |
| Journal | literacy trek |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.