Energy, transport, and consumption in the Industrial Revolution.

Clicks: 351
ID: 70467
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #7 of 11 articles by views in the behavioral and brain sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
We question Baumard's underlying assumption that humans have a propensity to innovate. Affordable transportation and energy underpinned the Industrial Revolution, making mass production/consumption possible. Although we cannot accept Baumard's thesis on the Industrial Revolution, it may help explain why complexity and innovation increase rapidly in the context of abundant energy.
Reference Key
tainter2019energythe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tainter, Joseph A;Taylor, Temis G;
Journal the behavioral and brain sciences
Year 2019
DOI
10.1017/S0140525X19000153
URL
Keywords
pregnancy birth outcomes intimate partner violence prenatal morbidities screening for violence

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.