Predicting tick-borne encephalitis using Google Trends.

Clicks: 387
ID: 69638
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #2 of 6 articles by views in Ticks and tick-borne diseases

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Data generated through public Internet searching offers a promising alternative source of information for monitoring and forecasting of infectious disease. Here future cases of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) were predicted using traditional weekly case reports, both with and without Google Trends data (GTD). Data on the weekly number of acute, confirmed TBE cases in Germany were obtained from the Robert Koch Institute. Data relating to the volume of Internet searching on TBE was downloaded from the Google Trends website. Data were split into training and validation parts. A SARIMA (0,1,1) (1,1,1) [52] model was used to describe the weekly TBE case number time series. Google Trends Data was used as an external regressor in a second, as optimal identified SARIMA (4,1,1) (1,1,1) [52] model. Predictions for the number of future cases were made with both models and compared with the validation dataset. GTD showed a significant correlation with reported weekly case numbers of TBE (p < 0.0001). A comparison of forecasted values with reported ones resulted in an RMSE (residual mean squared error) of 0.71 for the model without Google search values, and an RMSE of 0.70 for the Google Trends values enhanced model. However, difference between predictive performances was not significant (Diebold Mariano test, p-value = 0.14).
Reference Key
sulyok2020predictingticks Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sulyok, Mihály;Richter, Hardy;Sulyok, Zita;Kapitány-Fövény, Máté;Walker, Mark D;
Journal Ticks and tick-borne diseases
Year 2020
DOI
S1877-959X(19)30221-3
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.