Behavioral economics: science or exoticism?
Clicks: 351
ID: 68979
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
66.7
/100
351 views
234 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in Мир новой экономики
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While studying economics as a science and an active sphere of human activity, scientists aim to give consistency to their knowledge, ensure that they are adequate and constructive. To achieve the desired characteristics mentioned economic knowledge they draw on the achievements of other sciences, attracted by their methodology, tools and evidence of logic. In particular, to organize the synthesis of old and new economic knowledge in addition to the economic theory and its application specific discipline - management, marketing, forecasting, planning, accounting, control, analysis, finance, taxes, investments, etc. - Successfully used the scientific and methodological arsenal of mathematics, computer science, psychology, sociology, cultural studies, conflict resolution systems theory and other scientific fields. At various times one or another scientific field has a dominant position in economic science, which gives reason to assign it a specific place- names - natural, classical, neoclassical, behavioral. Currently dominated by the neo-classical (mainstream) the concept of the economy. The center is marked by the concept of economic man (homo economicus). It’s sort of a poluchelovek-polurobot, who knows everything, remembers everything and calculates, having stable “selfish” preferences, always act rationally, maximizing its own profits. Despite the fact that in real life it is not so - a reasonable man (homo sapiens) is always subject to the emotions and very often takes erroneous, irrational decisions - neoclassical economics continues to be zealous in mathematization and informatization of their decisions, completely oblivious to the fall of human trust in the them. In an effort to “humanize” too hard, the best solutions generated strictly deterministic algorithmic information systems, practitioners, economists transformed them into “digestible” options implemented management actions. The last being a broken through the prism of emotional and intuitive inner face of the world, decision- making, are always elements of subjectivity and irrationality. This behavior is inherent in human nature, and therefore subject to scrutiny, learning and improvement. Actually it is engaged and behavioral economics, the main provisions of which are considered in this article.
| Reference Key |
drogobytsky2018behavioral
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Drogobytsky, I. N.; |
| Journal | Мир новой экономики |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.