Which of available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is more effective in treatment of premature ejaculation? A randomized clinical trial.

Clicks: 481
ID: 68494
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 8 articles by views in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of available selective serotonin reuptake inhibi-tors (SSRIs) in order to find the most effective drug with the least number of side effects in treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).This study was a randomized clinical trial. Four hundred and eighty pati-ents with PE in the 4 groups referred to Imam Reza hospital Tehran, Iran from July 2018 to Fe-bruary 2019 were enrolled in the study. The patients received sertraline 50mg, fluoxetine 20mg, paroxetine 20mg and citalopram 20mg, every 12 hours daily. The intravaginal ejaculatory laten-cy time (IELT) before treatment, fourth and eighth weeks after treatment was recorded by the patient's wife with a stopwatch.Mean IELT before, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment in four groups were: sertraline 69.4±54.3, 353.5±190.4, 376.3±143.5; fluoxetine 75.5±64.3, 255.4±168.2, 314.8±190.4; paroxeti-ne 71.5±69.1, 320.7±198.3, 379.9±154.3; citalopram 90.39±79.3, 279.9±192.1, 282.5±171.1 seconds, respectively. The ejaculation time significantly increased in all groups (p <0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P=0.75). Also, there was no significant difference in drugs side effects between groups (p >0.05). The most common side effects were drowsiness and dyspepsia, which were not severe enough to cause discontinuation of the drug.All available SSRIs were effective and usually had no serious complications. In patients who did not respond to any of these drugs, other SSRI drugs could be used as a salvage therapy.
Reference Key
siroosbakhtwhichinternational Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Siroosbakht, Soheila;Rezakhaniha, Sadra;Rezakhaniha, Bijan;
Journal International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Year Year not found
DOI
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0121
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.