Clinic factors associated with better delivery of secondary prophylaxis in acute rheumatic fever management.

Clicks: 342
ID: 68129
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 5 articles by views in Australian journal of general practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is a complication of infection with group A streptococcus. ARF is treated with a long-term regimen of antibiotic secondary prophylaxis. Recent data have shown that only 36% of clients receive >80% of their regimen. The aim of this study was to determine clinic-level factors independently associated with the performance of primary healthcare clinics in delivering secondary prophylaxis to patients with ARF.Cross-sectional de-identified data from clinics agreeing to data retention through the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease National Research Partnership were accessed to calculate secondary prophylaxis performance scores and clinic-level factors associated with secondary prophylaxis performance using regression analysis.Thirty-six clinics and 496 client records met eligibility criteria for analysis. Clinic secondary prophylaxis performance was significantly associated with 'systematic processes of follow-up'. Every one unit increase in 'systematic approach to follow-up' increased the median level of secondary prophylaxis performance by 30% (95% confidence interval: 2, 66). Clinic accreditation status, location or workforce were not associated with secondary prophylaxis performance.General practitioners as clinical leaders are well placed to support managers to critically review follow-up and electronic reminder systems for secondary prophylaxis delivery at clinic level.
Reference Key
quinn2019clinicaustralian Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Quinn, Emma;Girgis, Seham;Van Buskirk, Joseph;Matthews, Veronica;Ward, Jeanette E;
Journal Australian journal of general practice
Year 2019
DOI
10.31128/AJGP-07-19-4987
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.