Levosimendan Reduces Mortality and Low Cardiac Output Syndrome in Cardiac Surgery.

Clicks: 338
ID: 67644
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
 There has been conflicting evidence concerning the effect of levosimendan on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and conducted this meta-analysis to provide evidence for/against the administration of levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients. We performed a meta-analysis from literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the administration of levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients with a control group (other inotrope, standard therapy/placebo, or an intra-aortic balloon pump) were included. In addition, at least one clinical outcome had to be mentioned: mortality, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, atrial fibrillation, prolonged inotropic support, length of intensive care unit, and hospital stay. The pooled treatment effects (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were assessed using a fixed or random effects model. The literature search retrieved 27 randomized, controlled trials involving a total of 3,198 patients. Levosimendan led to a significant reduction in mortality (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49-0.91;  = 0.0087). Furthermore, the incidence of LCOS (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.75;  < 0.0001), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46-0.86;  = 0.0039), and renal replacement therapy (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.98;  = 0.0332) was significantly decreased in the levosimendan group. Our meta-analysis suggests beneficial effects for the prophylactic use of levosimendan in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function undergoing cardiac surgery. The administration of levosimendan was associated with a reduced mortality, less LCOS, and restored adequate organ perfusion reflected in less acute kidney injury.
Reference Key
weber2019levosimendanthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Weber, Carolyn;Esser, Matthias;Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh;Sabashnikov, Anton;Djordjevic, Ilija;Maier, Johanna;Merkle, Julia;Choi, Yeong-Hoon;Madershahian, Navid;Liakopoulos, Oliver;Deppe, Antje Christin;Wahlers, Thorsten C W;
Journal The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
Year 2019
DOI
10.1055/s-0039-3400496
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.