Impact of stent deployment pressure and poststenting dilatation on the outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Clicks: 290
ID: 6752
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #79 of 242 articles by views in research reports in clinical cardiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 242 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Impact of stent deployment pressure and poststenting dilatation on the outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention Mahmoud K Nour Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Cairo, Egypt Background: High-pressure stent deployment was proposed as a strategy that ensures complete stent apposition but its relation to outcome is markedly debated. Objective: To verify the influence of stent deployment pressure and poststenting dilatation on the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: We included 120 patients with single vessel coronary artery disease who were subjected to elective stenting. Patients were divided into two groups: group A, high deployment pressure ≥16 atm and group B, low deployment pressure 8–12 atm. Group B was subdivided into two subgroups according to whether patients underwent poststenting dilatation (subgroup B1) or not (subgroup B2). Clinical and angiographic 6-month follow-up was performed. Results: The mean stent deployment pressure was higher in group A compared to group B (19±3 vs 10±2, P
Reference Key
mahmoud2016impactresearch Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mahmoud K Nour and
Journal research reports in clinical cardiology
Year 2016
DOI
10.2147/RRCC.S114771
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.