How quota allocation affects the unified ETS of China: a simulation with dynamic CGE model.

Clicks: 201
ID: 67517
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #340 of 403 articles by views in Environmental science and pollution research international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 403 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The national unified carbon trading market has been officially launched at the end of 2017. The carbon emission quotas should be primary concern, which can be allocated in the form of free and paid ways. However, few literatures studied the economic and environmental impacts of quotas allocation. Thus, this paper constructs 7 scenarios and employs a dynamic, recursive computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to simulate carbon trading market, to probe the relationship between quota allocation and carbon price, and the economic and environmental impact of carbon trading scheme (ETS). Empirical results indicate (1) carbon price has an upward trend with time, which reflects a corresponding increase in emission reduction pressure. Specifically, carbon price increases from 12.44-90.57 CNY/t in 2017 to 65.20-523.44 CNY/t in 2030. In addition, whether under carbon intensity criterion (CIC) or carbon emission criterion (CEC), there is a positive relationship between carbon price and free allocation ratio due to the change of the relationship between supply and demand of quota. With a given free allocation ratio, the price formed with CIC grows faster than that with CEC. (2) Compared with the benchmark scenario, the GDP of China decreases in all scenarios. However, a high level of free allocation ratio combined with CIC may prevent GDP dropping too fast. (3) As for industrial output, covered industries in ETS undertake the largest output losses with an average decline by 4.03-13.60%. Similar to GDP variation, a high free allocation ratio combined with CIC is helpful for sustainable development of industry. (4) Carbon trading has a remarkable effect on emission reductions both in covered and uncovered industries of ETS. Free allocation will reduce market efficiency, which implies it should be cut down gradually at the later stages.
Reference Key
wu2019howenvironmental Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Wu, Qunli;Li, Chunxiang;
Journal Environmental science and pollution research international
Year 2019
DOI
10.1007/s11356-019-06588-8
URL
Keywords
allocation criterion carbon quota allocation carbon trading scheme (ets) dynamic recursive cge model free allocation ratio

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.