ASSESSMENT RESULTS OF COLLECTION SAMPLES OF WINTER WHEAT ON TOLERANCE TO SMUT (TILLETIA LEVIS)

Clicks: 399
ID: 67512
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #1 of 4 articles by views in Зерновое хозяйство России

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article gives the analysis of the experiments of 106 winter wheat cultivars of different origin on tolerance to smut fungi.  The pathogen being present from the moment of sprouting till seed maturation makes a suppressing effect on the plant. It reduces seed germination, makes plants be stunted and reduces seed filling. Besides grain infected by smut is unusable for food and forage. To protect wheat seeds from smut pathogen we widely apply chemicals, but a more ecological and less expensive method is of great importance nowadays. It’s a technology of hybridization and cultivation of tolerant to the disease cultivars, for selection of which we need the sources of resistance and tolerance to the pathogen.  At the experimental field artificially infected with smut of Rostov origin the cultivars ‘Zolotokolosa’, ‘Pivna’ (Ukraine), ‘Hoff’, ‘KS 93 U76’ (US), Elba (Latvia) showed the best tolerance to smut. The infection of the cultivars varied from 0 till 9,8% during different years. Thirteen cultivars showed little response to the pathogen (from 10,7 till 22,6%). 49 cultivars showed average response to the pathogen, it’s 46,2% of all studied cultivars. 39 cultivars showed the highest response to the pathogen, that is 36,8% of all cultivars. The chosen cultivars are the most valuable material for further selection on smut tolerance.
Reference Key
shishkin2018assessment Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Shishkin, N. V.;Derova, T. G.;Marchenko, D. M.;
Journal Зерновое хозяйство России
Year 2018
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.