Using frozen section margin control technique to manage non-melanomatous skin lesions in high-risk sites.
Clicks: 371
ID: 67235
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
68.8
/100
371 views
231 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 6 articles by views in journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : jpras
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the UK, non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) that are incompletely excised, recurrent or in sites high risk for incomplete excision are often offered Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Variations in waiting times and geographical access to MMS affect patient preference for other treatments. Our unit offers excision of such lesions under complete margin frozen section histological examination.All NMSCs excised at our unit by complete margin frozen section histological analysis from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The number of excisions required, complete excision rates and recurrences to date were analysed.Sixty-nine patients were treated using this technique with a total of 70 lesions excised. Approximately 71% of the excision margins were clear after primary excision, 27% at second excision and 1% at third excision. Patients had a mean follow-up of 12 months (range: 1-48) with no patients lost to follow-up and no recurrences reported to date. Ninety-eight percent of NMSC cases were completely excised and two cases were incompletely excised.We have found the rates of excision and recurrence of the high-risk NMSCs excised at our unit to be comparable to those reported with MMS. In addition, our data show that around 29% of patients would have had incomplete margins on primary resection, thus justifying the use of this technique in this group. We suggest that this technique is a safe and useful alternative to MMS in areas where waiting times or geographical patient preference may prohibit its use.
| Reference Key |
nizamoglu2016usingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nizamoglu, Metin;Douglas, Helen;McArdle, Ciarstan;Mathew, Bipin;Vize, Colin;Matteucci, Paolo; |
| Journal | journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : jpras |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.023
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.