Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging phantoms: A review and the need for a system phantom.
Clicks: 342
ID: 67137
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
63.1
/100
342 views
232 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 13 articles by views in Magnetic resonance in medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The MRI community is using quantitative mapping techniques to complement qualitative imaging. For quantitative imaging to reach its full potential, it is necessary to analyze measurements across systems and longitudinally. Clinical use of quantitative imaging can be facilitated through adoption and use of a standard system phantom, a calibration/standard reference object, to assess the performance of an MRI machine. The International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine AdHoc Committee on Standards for Quantitative Magnetic Resonance was established in February 2007 to facilitate the expansion of MRI as a mainstream modality for multi-institutional measurements, including, among other things, multicenter trials. The goal of the Standards for Quantitative Magnetic Resonance committee was to provide a framework to ensure that quantitative measures derived from MR data are comparable over time, between subjects, between sites, and between vendors. This paper, written by members of the Standards for Quantitative Magnetic Resonance committee, reviews standardization attempts and then details the need, requirements, and implementation plan for a standard system phantom for quantitative MRI. In addition, application-specific phantoms and implementation of quantitative MRI are reviewed. Magn Reson Med 79:48-61, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
| Reference Key |
keenan2018quantitativemagnetic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Keenan, Kathryn E;Ainslie, Maureen;Barker, Alex J;Boss, Michael A;Cecil, Kim M;Charles, Cecil;Chenevert, Thomas L;Clarke, Larry;Evelhoch, Jeffrey L;Finn, Paul;Gembris, Daniel;Gunter, Jeffrey L;Hill, Derek L G;Jack, Clifford R;Jackson, Edward F;Liu, Guoying;Russek, Stephen E;Sharma, Samir D;Steckner, Michael;Stupic, Karl F;Trzasko, Joshua D;Yuan, Chun;Zheng, Jie; |
| Journal | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1002/mrm.26982
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.