Effects of Operating Room Size on Surgical Site Infection Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
Clicks: 338
ID: 66231
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
338 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in international journal of spine surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a devastating complication after spine surgery. Many factors have been identified, but the influence of operating room (OR) size on infection rate has not been assessed.Two thousand five hundred and twenty-three patients who underwent open lumbar spine fusion at a single institution between 2010 and 2016 were included. Patients were dichotomized into large versus small groups based on OR volume. Bivariate logistic regression and a final multivariate model following a multicollinearity check were used to calculate odds of infection for all variables.A total of 63 patients (2.5%) developed SSIs with 46 (73%) in the larger OR group and 17 (27%) in the smaller OR group. The rate of SSIs in larger ORs was 3.02% compared with 1.81% in smaller ORs. Significant parameters impacting SSI in bivariate analysis included an earlier year of surgery, BMI > 30, more comorbidities, more levels decompressed and fused, smoking, and larger OR volumes. Multivariate analysis identified BMI > 30, Elixhauser scores, smoking, and increasing levels decompressed as significant predictors. Topical vancomycin was found to significantly decrease rate of infection in both analyses.OR size (large versus small) was ultimately not a significant predictor of infection related to rates of SSIs, although it did show a clinical trend toward significance, suggesting association. Future prospective analysis is warranted.3.
| Reference Key |
salmons2019effectsinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Salmons, Harold I;Lendner, Mayan;Divi, Srikanth N;Dworkin, Myles;McKenzie, James;Tarazona, Daniel;Gala, Zachary;Lendner, Yovel;Woods, Barrett;Kaye, David;Savage, Jason;Kepler, Christopher;Kurd, Mark;Hsu, Victor;Radcliff, Kris;Rihn, Jeff;Anderson, Greg;Hilibrand, Alan;Vaccaro, Alex;Schroeder, Gregory; |
| Journal | international journal of spine surgery |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.14444/6057
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.