Droplet digital PCR improves urinary exosomal miRNA detection compared to real-time PCR.

Clicks: 513
ID: 65775
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #1 of 6 articles by views in Clinical biochemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Quantification of urinary miRNAs can be challenging especially for low abundance miRNAs. We aimed to optimize the quantification of urinary exosomal miRNAs and compare the performance efficiency between droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).We optimized a number of parameters for ddPCR such as annealing temperatures, annealing time and PCR cycle number. We also compared the performance of ddPCR and qPCR.By comparing the fluorescence amplification separation, the optimal annealing temperature was 59 °C, optimal annealing time was 60s and optimal cycle number was 45 for measuring urinary exosomal miRNAs. ddPCR had much higher technical sensitivity compared to qPCR. The minimal detectable concentration of miR-29a was <50 copies/μL by ddPCR compared to 6473 copies/μL for qPCR. Also, ddPCR generated more consistent results for serially diluted samples compared to qPCR. ddPCR generated smaller within-run variations than qPCR though this did not reach statistical significance. It also resulted in better reproducibility with smaller between-run variations.Optimization of urinary exosomal miRNA ddPCR assay is dependent on assessing key variables including experimental annealing temperature and time as well as the number of PCR cycles. ddPCR has a higher sensitivity, reproducibility, and accuracy in comparison to qPCR.
Reference Key
wang2019dropletclinical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Wang, Cong;Ding, Qiang;Plant, Pamela;Basheer, Mayada;Yang, Chuance;Tawedrous, Eriny;Krizova, Adriana;Boulos, Carl;Farag, Mina;Cheng, Yufeng;Yousef, George M;
Journal Clinical biochemistry
Year 2019
DOI
S0009-9120(18)30907-X
URL
Keywords
optimization exosome qpcr mirna urine ddpcr abbreviations droplet digital polymerase chain reaction quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.