Validation Instrument to Evaluate Students' Perception of Virtual Manipulatives in Learning Mathematics.

Clicks: 432
ID: 65739
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in journal of applied measurement

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The advent of new technologies has replaced physical manipulatives - which are physical models of equivalent representation of concepts by virtual manipulatives which many learners and teachers find useful in the mathematics classroom. The current study investigated students' motivation to engage with virtual manipulatives as a tool in the mathematics education. Activity theory was used to conduct a multicomponential survey of virtual manipulatives in education and administered it to 442 Iranian high school students with the aim of examining students' perception of various aspects of the manipulatives. Using the Rasch-Andrich rating scale model (RSM), an item response theory model, psychometric features of the instrument were examined item endorsibility, learners' ability, fit, and unidimensionality. The validated instrument can be used to find the factors that could improve students' perceptions of virtual manipulatives in the mathematics classroom.
Reference Key
zeynivandnezhadvalidationjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zeynivandnezhad, Fereshteh;
Journal journal of applied measurement
Year Year not found
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.