Do Preys Prey on Their Predators? Confusion Over Predatory "Hage-taka" Journals.

Clicks: 269
ID: 65436
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
For the last several years, predatory journals have been a topic of discussion in top scientific journals, such as . Predatory journals are problematic because they create public mistrust of scientific publication as a whole by the mass production of non-credible publications with the sole aim of profit. Recently, articles in a Japanese newspaper and online articles exposed domestic institutions for the number of publications in predatory journals, saying that they "abused predatory journals to increase the number of their publications and falsely inflate their academic achievements." We do not subscribe to this point of view because publications in predatory journals do not count as scholarly achievements, and we believe it is an information literacy problem. We feel strongly that it is both important and beneficial for the readers of to be aware of and understand this issue.
Reference Key
takabe2019dojapan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Takabe, Kazuaki;Nagahashi, Masayuki;Butash, Ali L;Wakai, Toshifumi;
Journal japan medical association journal : jmaj
Year 2019
DOI
10.31662/jmaj.2019-0011
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.