A Research on The Hedonism in Plato’s Protagoras

Clicks: 284
ID: 64849
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 5 articles by views in ankara Üniversitesi dil ve tarih-coğrafya fakültesi dergisi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Plato’s method of treating the pleasure theme in Protatogas recently has been discussed by various significant researchers, neverthless they couldn’t have been reached an agreement whether Plato is a hedonist or anti-hedonist in this dialogue. The earliest dialogue which Plato discussed pleasure, is Protagoras. Due to the identification pleasure with the good one, it has been thought that Plato had a hedonist side. Then, his method of treating the pleasure in later dialogues –Gorgias, Phaedo, Republic, Philebus and Timaeus- will appear as an attitude of antihedonist. In this paper, starting from the premise ‘pleasure is good’, we will scrutinize these questions: Does Socrates really accept hedonism? If he accepts, which way it brings him hedonists? If not, which context he uses the pleasure in this dialogue?By this way, intended to be understood the role of pleasure in Socrates’ debate.
Reference Key
sonmez2017aankara Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors SÖNMEZ, Ayşe;
Journal ankara Üniversitesi dil ve tarih-coğrafya fakültesi dergisi
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/160
Keywords
history of scholarship and learning. the humanities social sciences (general) social sciences language and literature fine arts arts in general

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.