Comparison of models to evaluate microbial sulphide generation and transport in the near field of a SF/HLW repository in Opalinus Clay.
Clicks: 336
ID: 64595
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
69.2
/100
336 views
225 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 15 articles by views in journal of contaminant hydrology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In a deep geological repository for radioactive waste in the Opalinus Clay, disposal canisters may be corroded due to sulphide produced by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB). This paper presents two computational models, a reactive transport model (RTM) and a simplified semi-analytical model (SM), to evaluate the potential of SRB to generate elevated sulphide concentrations, to assess sulphide fluxes to the canister and, in a simplified manner, the resulting canister corrosion. Calculations performed in the context of the repository's safety assessment based on a shared conceptual model reveal that the two computational models are complementary. The reactive transport model incorporates state-of-the-art understanding of the system's geochemistry, but is currently too computationally demanding to be applied in probabilistic safety assessment sensitivity analyses. The simplified model is fast and efficient, but some of its assumptions need to be verified, and some parameter values need to be calibrated using the more complete reactive transport model. Nonetheless, given the same set of assumptions, the two models predict comparable magnitudes of sulphide fluxes to the canister and comparable canister corrosion depths.
| Reference Key |
pekala2019comparisonjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pekala, Marek;Smith, Paul;Wersin, Paul;Diomidis, Nikitas;Cloet, Veerle; |
| Journal | journal of contaminant hydrology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0169-7722(19)30121-4
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.