Clinical translation of the assets of biomedical engineering - a retrospective analysis with looks to the future.
Clicks: 491
ID: 63683
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
491 views
62 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 6 articles by views in expert review of medical devices
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
: Biomedical-engineering (BME) plays a major role in modern medicine. Many BME-based assets have been brought to clinical translation in the 20 century, but translation currently stagnates. Here, we compare the impact of past and present scientific, economic and societal climates on the translation of BME-based assets, in order to provide the BME-community with incentives to address current stagnation. : In the 20 century, W.J. Kolff brought kidney dialysis, the total artificial heart, artificial vision and limbs to clinical application. This success raises the question whether Kolff and other past giants of clinical translation had special mind-sets, or whether their problem selection, their training, or governmental and regulatory control played roles. Retrospective analysis divides the impact of BME-based assets to clinical application into three periods: 1900-1970: rapid translation from bench-to-bedside, 1970-1990: new diseases and increased governmental control, and the current translational crisis from 1990 onward. : Academic and societal changes can be discerned that are concurrent with BME's translational success: mono-disciplinary multi-disciplinary training, academic reward systems based on individual achievements team achievements with strong leadership, increased governmental and regulatory control, and industrial involvement. From this, recommendations can be derived for accelerating clinical translation of BME-assets.
| Reference Key |
ren2019clinicalexpert
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ren, Yijin;Fagette, Paul H;Hall, Connie L;Broers, Herman;Grainger, David W;van der Mei, Henny C;Busscher, Henk J; |
| Journal | expert review of medical devices |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1080/17434440.2019.1685869
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.