Análise das habilidades de consciência fonológica em crianças de 2ª série alfabetizadas em diferentes metodologias de ensino Analysis of phonological abilities awareness of second school children who became literate by different learning methodologies
Clicks: 594
ID: 63244
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
81.0
/100
594 views
446 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #4 of 9 articles by views in revista cefac
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVO: avaliar e analisar o desempenho em tarefas de habilidades fonológicas de crianças que cursam a 2ª série do Ensino Fundamental de escolas da rede privada do Estado de São Paulo, que estejam inseridas nos métodos de alfabetização: Montessoriano e Construtivista. MÉTODOS: para a realização desta pesquisa foram selecionadas 60 crianças que cursam a 2ª série do Ensino Fundamental de escolas da rede privada do Estado de São Paulo, sendo que estes alunos foram subdivididos, considerando o método de alfabetização: montessoriano ou construtivista, totalizando 30 crianças inseridas em cada metodologia de ensino. Foi aplicado o teste de Consciência Fonológica, por meio do Confias (Consciência Fonológicas: Instrumento de Avaliação Seqüencial) nas crianças selecionadas para a pesquisa, a aplicação do teste ocorreu dentro das escolas participantes, após prévia autorização dos pais. RESULTADOS: as crianças não apresentaram diferença no desempenho em nível de sílaba e fonema em ambas metodologias de ensino. CONCLUSÃO: não foi possível evidenciar influência direta da metodologia de ensino no desempenho das tarefas de habilidades fonológicas.
PURPOSE: to evaluate and analyze the performance in phonological ability tasks of second-grade children of the elementary school in private schools of the state of São Paulo, in the following methods of literacy: montessorian and constructivism. METHODS: 60 second-grade children of in elementary school private schools of the state of São Paulo were select for carrying through this research, divided in schools inserted in the following methods: montessoriano and constructivism in a total of 30 children of each institution. RESULTS: the children have not demonstrated difference in the performance in syllable level and phoneme in both education methodologies. CONCLUSION: it was not possible to evidence direct influence of education methodology on the performance of the tasks of phonological abilities.
PURPOSE: to evaluate and analyze the performance in phonological ability tasks of second-grade children of the elementary school in private schools of the state of São Paulo, in the following methods of literacy: montessorian and constructivism. METHODS: 60 second-grade children of in elementary school private schools of the state of São Paulo were select for carrying through this research, divided in schools inserted in the following methods: montessoriano and constructivism in a total of 30 children of each institution. RESULTS: the children have not demonstrated difference in the performance in syllable level and phoneme in both education methodologies. CONCLUSION: it was not possible to evidence direct influence of education methodology on the performance of the tasks of phonological abilities.
| Reference Key |
santos2008analiserevista
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Santos, Viviane Breda dos;Horta, Vanessa Ferreira;Lacerda, Carina Corrêa;Nemr, Kátia; |
| Journal | revista cefac |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.