What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated

Clicks: 356
ID: 62929
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 5 articles by views in bucharest working papers in linguistics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The present paper, which takes Bach’s (1994) distinction between ‘what is said’, ‘implicature’, and ‘impliciture’ as a starting point, shows that Grice’s tests of non-detachability and cancellability are able to clarify the distinction among different elements of utterance meaning that are pragmatically determined. We establish that conversational implicature is cancellable and detachable.By using examples, we emphasize the difference between what is explicitly said and what goes implicit in what is said.
Reference Key
ioni2008whatbucharest Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ioniţă, Diana;
Journal bucharest working papers in linguistics
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/what_is_said_what_is_implicated_what_is_implicated
Keywords
psychology social sciences philology. linguistics language and literature philosophy (general) languages and literature of eastern asia, africa, oceania history of medicine. medical expeditions

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.