Endovascular Aneurysm Repair May Provide a Survival Advantage in Patients Deemed Physiologically Ineligible for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Clicks: 418
ID: 62793
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
71.3
/100
418 views
278 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #2 of 18 articles by views in annals of vascular surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides an objective assessment of functional capacity and fitness. It can be used to guide decision making prior to major vascular surgery. The EVAR-2 trial suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients unfit for open repair failed to provide a significant survival advantage over nonsurgical management. The aim of this study is to assess contemporary survival differences between patients with poor CPET measures who underwent EVAR or were not offered surgical intervention.A prospectively maintained database of CPET results of patients considered for elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair were interrogated. Anaerobic threshold (AT) of <11 mL/min/kg was used to indicate poor physical fitness. Hospital electronic records were then reviewed for perioperative, reintervention, and long-term outcomes.Between November 2007 and October 2017, 532 aortic aneurysm repairs were undertaken, of which 376 underwent preoperative CPET. Seventy patients were identified as having an AT <11 mL/min/kg. Thirty-seven patients underwent EVAR and 33 were managed nonsurgically. All-cause survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for those patients who underwent EVAR was 97%, 92%, and 81%, respectively. For those not offered surgical intervention survival at the same points was 72%, 48%, and 24% [hazard ratio, HR = 5.13 (1.67-15.82), P = 0.004]. Aneurysm-specific survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for those patients who underwent EVAR was 97%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. Survival at the same time points for those not offered surgical intervention was 90%, 69%, and 39%, respectively [HR = 7.48 (1.37-40.82), P = 0.02].In this small, retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized cohort, EVAR may provide a survival advantage in patients with poor physical fitness identified via CPET. Randomized studies with current generation EVAR are required to validate the results shown here.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (99 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
fisher2019endovascularannals
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Fisher, Owain;Gates, Zoe;Parkes, Edward;Shakespeare, Joanna;Goodyear, Steven J;Imray, Christopher H E;Benson, Ruth A; |
| Journal | annals of vascular surgery |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0890-5096(19)30542-4
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.