When the political becomes personal: Reflecting on disability bioethics.
Clicks: 385
ID: 62787
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
81.6
/100
385 views
243 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 26 articles by views in bioethics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A discussion of the connection between activism and academia in bioethics, highlighting the author's own trajectory, exploring the extent to which academics have an obliation to be 'judges' rather than 'barristers' (as explored by Jonathan Haidt) and asking questions about the relationship of disability to positions in bioethics.
| Reference Key |
shakespeare2019whenbioethics
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Shakespeare, Tom; |
| Journal | bioethics |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/bioe.12668
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.