Clinician's opinion about critical risk results proposed by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists: a survey in one Croatian tertiary hospital.
Clicks: 339
ID: 62162
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
339 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #4 of 12 articles by views in biochemia medica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
It has been recommended that each laboratory modify their critical result reporting practices to reflect the clinical needs of their patient populations. The aim of this survey was to assess how well critical laboratory values defined by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists (CCMB) correspond to the needs of the physicians at University hospital "Sveti Duh" (Zagreb, Croatia).We conducted a survey among physicians from five departments in our hospital. Physicians were asked general questions about critical risk results (if and how they want to be informed). A list of critical risk results defined by the CCMB was offered and physicians were asked to revise the existing critical risk results and suggest adding new parameters. Obtained data were presented as numbers. Where the number of observations was low, ratios were used.Survey response rate was 43% (52/121). Majority (48/52) wants to be informed of critical risk results, either personally (31/48) or through a colleague (32/48). They prefer to be informed about critical risk results of prothrombin time, platelet count, haemoglobin, glucose, creatinine, sodium and potassium. Revisions in the CCMB critical risk result list are proposed by 13 out of 48 physicians. Neonatologists approved the CCMB's list.Although most critical risk results defined by the CCMB correspond well to the needs of the physicians in our hospital, some revisions are necessary to meet the particular needs of individual departments. Communication of critical risk results to those who have requested laboratory testing is highly appreciated practice.
| Reference Key |
onji2019cliniciansbiochemia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Šonjić, Pavica;Nikler, Ana;Vuljanić, Dora;Dukić, Lora;Šimundić, Ana-Maria; |
| Journal | biochemia medica |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.11613/BM.2019.030711
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.