Barriers and facilitators to development and implementation of a rural primary health care intervention for dementia: a process evaluation.

Клики: 378
ID: 62100
2019
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #55 of 184 articles by views in BMC health services research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 184 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Аннотация
With rural population aging there are growing numbers of people with dementia in rural and remote settings. The role of primary health care (PHC) is critical in rural locations, yet there is a lack of rural-specific PHC models for dementia, and little is known about factors influencing the development, implementation, and sustainability of rural PHC interventions. Using a community-based participatory research approach, researchers collaborated with a rural PHC team to co-design and implement an evidence-based interdisciplinary rural PHC memory clinic in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. This paper reports barriers and facilitators to developing, implementing, and sustaining the intervention.A qualitative longitudinal process evaluation was conducted over two and half years, from pre- to post-implementation. Data collection and analyses were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which consists of 38 constructs within five domains: innovation characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, individual characteristics, and process. Data were collected via focus groups with the PHC team and stakeholders, smaller team workgroup meetings, and team member interviews. Analysis was conducted using a deductive approach to apply CFIR codes to the data and an inductive analysis to identify barriers and facilitators.Across all domains, 14 constructs influenced development and implementation. Three domains (innovation characteristics, inner setting, process) were most important. Facilitators were the relative advantage of the intervention, ability to trial on a small scale, tension for change, leadership engagement, availability of resources, education and support from researchers, increased self-efficacy, and engagement of champions. Barriers included the complexity of multiple intervention components, required practice changes, lack of formal incentive programs, time intensiveness of modifying the EMR during iterative development, lack of EMR access by all team members, lack of co-location of team members, workload and busy clinical schedules, inability to justify a designated dementia care manager role, and turnover of PHC team members.The study identified key factors that supported and hindered the development and implementation of a rural-specific strategy for dementia assessment and management in PHC. Despite challenges related to the rural context, the researcher-academic partnership was successful in developing and implementing the intervention.
Ссылочный ключ
morgan2019barriersbmc Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
Авторы Morgan, Debra;Kosteniuk, Julie;O'Connell, Megan E;Kirk, Andrew;Stewart, Norma J;Seitz, Dallas;Bayly, Melanie;Froehlich Chow, Amanda;Elliot, Valerie;Daku, Jean;Hack, Tracy;Hoium, Faye;Kennett-Russill, Deb;Sauter, Kristen;
Журнал BMC health services research
Год 2019
DOI
10.1186/s12913-019-4548-5
URL
Ключевые слова
research ethics low- and middle-income countries scoping review community advisory boards

Цитирования

Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org

Комментарии

Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.