WHO 2018 treatment guidelines for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: uncertainty, potential risks and the way forward.
Clicks: 285
ID: 61942
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
285 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #18 of 23 articles by views in international journal of antimicrobial agents
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines for multidrug-/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) give preference to all-oral long regimens for 18-20 months. The document strongly recommends combining bedaquiline, levofloxacin (or moxifloxacin) and linezolid, supplemented by cycloserine and/or clofazimine. The effectiveness of this combination in a long regimen has not been tested in any study with corresponding uncertainty. The guidelines indicate that, ideally, all MDR-TB patients should have - as a minimum - the isolate tested for fluoroquinolone, bedaquiline, and linezolid susceptibility before treatment start. Unfortunately, the drug susceptibility testing capacity in resource-limited settings is insufficient. The risk of acquired bedaquiline resistance cannot be ignored, especially in patients with undetected resistance to fluoroquinolone. Both linezolid and cycloserine are known for their high frequency of serious adverse events. The combination of bedaquiline, moxifloxacin and clofazimine in the same regimen may excessively increase the QT interval. These expected adverse effects are difficult to monitor and manage in resource-limited settings and may result in frequent modifications and a less effective regimen. The final STREAM results have confirmed the non-inferiority of the short regimen compared to the long regimen. Before evidence on the all-oral long and modified all-oral short treatment regimens is available, the WHO-recommended short MDR-TB regimens, with monitoring for ototoxicity, remain a better treatment option for the management of MDR/RR-TB patients who are eligible for short regimens in low- and middle-income countries. National tuberculosis programmes should also strengthen their capacity in the detection and management of fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB following WHO's guidelines.
| Reference Key |
van-deun2019whointernational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Van Deun, Armand;Decroo, Tom;Tahseen, Sabira;Trébucq, Arnaud;Schwoebel, Valérie;Ortuno-Gutierrez, Nimer;de Jong, Bouke C;Rieder, Hans L;Piubello, Alberto;Chiang, Chen-Yuan; |
| Journal | international journal of antimicrobial agents |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0924-8579(19)30277-8
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.